Models of Hedonia and Eudaimonia; and their Relation to Optimal Functioning and Minimum Functioning Among Female University Students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Psychology Faculty of Women for Arts, Science & Education Ain Shams University - Egypt

2 Faculty of Women-Ain Shams University - Egypt

3 Faculty of Women for Arts, Science & Education Ain Shams University - Egypt

Abstract

The present study aims at exploring models of hedonia/eudaimonia and functional performance among female university students and selecting models of hedonia/eudaimonia among female students as well as investigating their relation to optimal and minimum functioning. The sample of the study incorporates (290) female university students whose ages range from 17 to 21 years. The study relies on HEMA scale in measuring hedonia and eudaimonia (Huta and Ryan, 2010; as translated by Saffaa El-Assar) as well on Rotter’s scale (RISB). The study also relies on the descriptive relational comparative approach in order to answer the study questions. While modelling the levels of hedonia and eudaimonia, four models have been extracted: a high level of hedonia/eudaimonia (33.1%), an average level of hedonia/eudaimonia (22.07%), a high level of hedonia/an average level of eudaimonia (25.17%), a high level of eudaimonia/an average level of hedonia (19.66%).  Moreover, it was found out that optimal functioning is more related to the model which reveals a high level of hedonia/eudaimonia, followed by that which reveals an average level of hedonia/a high level of eudaimonia.

Keywords


References:
Anic, P. (2014) .Hedonic And Eudaimonic Motives for Favourite Leisure Activities, PRIMENJENA PSIHOLOGIJA, Vol. 7(1), 5-2
Bettencourt, A., & Sheldon, K. (2001). Social roles as mechanism for psychological need satisfaction within social groups, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6): 131-143
Battista, J., & Almond, R. (1973). The development of meaning in life, Psychiatry, 36, 409–427
Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2011). Building a neuroscience of pleasure and wellbeing. Psychol Well Being 24; 1(1): 1–3.
Clark, K., & James, K. (2000).Justice and positive and negative creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 311–320.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row. 26.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘'what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Diener, E., & Lucas, R.E. (2000). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213-229). New York: Russell Sage.
Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & King, L. A. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 208-211
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2010). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health andlongevity. Health and Well-Being, 3, 1–43
Fredrickson, B., & Losada, M. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678-686.
Fredrickson K., B, Cohn, Coffey. M. & Pek., J. (2008) Open Hearts Build Lives: Positive Emotions, Induced Through Loving-Kindness Meditation, Build Consequential Personal Resources, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (5):1045-1062.
Garling, T., Gamble, A. (2011). The Relationships between Life Satisfaction, Happiness, and Current Mood, Journal of Happiness Studies 13(1):31-45
Gilligan C., & Attanucci J., (1988). Two Moral Orientations: Gender Differences and Similarities, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 223-237.
Haidt, J. (2006). The Happiness Hypothesis. London: Arrow Books.
Henderson, L., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 196–221.
 
Huebners, A. (1991). Initial Development of the Student's Life Satisfaction Scale, School Psychology International, 12, 231-243.
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735-762
Huta, V. (2012). Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: Parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies. Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 47-61
Huta V, Pelletier L, Baxter, D., & Thompson, A. (2012).How eudaimonic and hedonic motives relate to the well-being of close others, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5):399-404
Johnson, D. & Shin, M. (1978).Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality-of-life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.
Kasser, T. & Ryan, R. M. (2001), Be Careful What You Wish For: Optimal Functioning and the Relative Attainment of Intrinsic Extrinsic Goals. In: P.Schmuck & K. Sheldon (Eds.), Life Goals and Well-Being (pp. 116-131), Gottingen, Hogrefe.
King LA, Napa CK. (1998). What makes life good? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75:156–65.
Kryza-Lacombe, M., (2016) Hedonia and Eudaimonia: Associations with Academic Success, Wellbeing, and Neuropsychological Functioning, CUNY Academic Works.
Little TD. (1998). Mean and covariance struc-tures (MACS) analyses of cross-culturaldata: practical and theoretical issues. Multiv.Behavior Research. 32:53–76
Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62.
Noreen, S., & MacLeod, M. D. (2015). What do we really know about cognitive inhibition? Task demands and inhibitory effects across a range of memory and behavioural tasks. PLoS ONE, 10(8).
Maslow, A. H. (1971).The Farther Reaches of Hu-man Nature. New York: VikingMcGregorI, Little BR. 1998. Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: on doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.74:494–512
McGrath, R., Robert, E., Rashid, T., Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2010). 'Is Optimal Functioning a Distinct State?' The Humanistic Psychologist, 38: 2, 159 – 169
Merrick, A. D., Grieve, A. and Cogan, N. (2017) .Psychological impacts of challenging behaviour and motivational orientation in staff supporting individuals with autistic spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(7), pp. 872-880.
Mekler, E.  , Hornbaek, K. (2016). Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning? Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences, Publication: CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, P.P 4509–4520 https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858225
Mise T-R (2014). Two Levels of Motivation and Two Types of Well-Being: Relations between General and Goal-Specific Motivations, and Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-Being. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment Of the requirements, for the degree Master of Arts Department of Psychology, Brock University St. Catharines.
Reker, G. T., & Fry, P. S. (2003). Factor structure and invariance of personal meaning measures in cohorts of younger and older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 977–993.
Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 1069-1081
Ryff C., & Keyes C., (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69 (4):719-727.
Ryff, C.D & Singer, B. (1998). The Contours of Positive Human Health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1-28
Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and Subjective Well-Being: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35, 459-486
Seligman, M. (2002). Positive Psychology, Positive Prevention and Positive Therapy. In Snyder C. & Lopez S. J. (Eds.). The Handbook of Positive Psychology (3-12). New York: Oxford.
Seligman, G. & Csikszentmihlyi, M. (2002). Positive psychology: An introuduction. A American psychological association, 55 (1) 5-14.
Sheldon, Kennon M. & Krieger A., Lawrence, S. (2006). Understanding the Negative Effects of Legal Education on Law Students: A Longitudinal Test and Extension of Self-Determination Theory, PersonalityAnd Social Psychology Bulltin, Vol. 33 No. 6, 883-897
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-429
Schwartz, B. & Sharpe., K. (2006).  Practical Wisdom: Aristotle meets Positive Psychology, Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3):377-395.
Shirai, K., Iso, H., Ohira, T. (2009). Perceived Level of Life Enjoyment and Risks of Cardiovascular Disease in Incidence and Mortality: The Japan Public Health Center-Based Study. Circulation, 20, 956-963.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.83417
Snyder (Eds.) (2001).  Handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 608-618). New York: Oxford University Press.
Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42.
Telfer. E., (1980). Happiness: An Examination of a Hedonistic and a Eudaemonistic Concept of Happiness and of the Relations between Them, with a Consideration of how Far and in what Sense Either Kind of Happiness May be Said to be the Goal of Human Life, Macmillan.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts ofpersonal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79
Wolf, S. (1982). Moral saints. The Journal of Philosophy, 79, 419–439.